Feed aggregator

🎥 КПІ ім. Ігоря Сікорського поглиблює партнерство з Румунією kpi вт, 04/28/2026 - 22:12

Вітаємо директора НН ФТІ Олексія Новікова з премією НАН України kpi вт, 04/28/2026 - 22:05

Візит Ніколя Тензера — французького політолога, аналітика із питань міжнародної безпеки та прав людини kpi вт, 04/28/2026 - 22:01

КПІ посилює кіберстійкість держави: університет став майданчиком Locked Shields 2026 kpi вт, 04/28/2026 - 21:56

Deepak Shankar, founder of Mirabilis Design and developer of VisualSim Architect platform for chip and system designs, has created this cartoon for electronics design engineers.

The post The system architect’s sketchbook: The tree knows appeared first on EDN.

The drive toward greater accuracy, efficiency, and automation in manufacturing environments and smart factories is accelerating at an unprecedented pace. This includes the deployment of advanced robotic systems, including autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) and collaborative robots working alongside humans, known as cobots.

The future of manufacturing depends on safe and seamless human-robot collaboration, requiring robots to dynamically adapt to the presence and movements of human workers. Maximizing the potential of these collaborative environments demands a critical capability: fast, accurate, and reliable 3D spatial sensing.

Traditional sensing methods often fall short in dynamic industrial settings that require reliable performance and high resolution. So, precision laser technologies, particularly time-of-flight (ToF) and frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) lidar, are emerging as key technologies, providing the detailed environmental sensing technology necessary for robots to navigate safely around personnel and to optimize workflows without compromising human safety.

Advanced lidar systems enable highly precise obstacle detection, distance measurement and real-time mapping, facilitating safer interaction between humans and robots. Design engineers are integrating the technology into automated factory systems to address the challenges of modern manufacturing while boosting accuracy, operational safety, and overall production efficiency.

How ToF lidar uses light to measure distance in smart factories

ToF lidar delivers highly accurate distance measurements by timing the round-trip travel of laser pulses, creating precise 3D point clouds of all objects in the surrounding environment—giving AMRs and cobots a detailed, real-time picture of their workspace. A ToF lidar system emits a pulse of invisible laser light onto an object and receives the reflected pulse back.

The system then calculates the distance between the transmitter/receiver and the object based on how long that round trip takes. Figure 1 shows a high-level diagram of a single-point optical ToF lidar system.

Figure 1 Distance measurement is shown between the object and the ToF lidar. Source: Texas Instruments

Cameras and ultrasonic sensors fall short in dynamic applications

Camera-based systems and ultrasonic sensing cannot match the speed and precision that ToF lidar delivers for distance measurement. While cameras excel at extracting texture and color information from their environment, they struggle with depth perception, especially in challenging lighting conditions.

Cameras often require illumination of the entire area of interest to function accurately, while ToF lidar systems, such as the module on top of the robot in Figure 2, supply their own illumination in the form of laser pulses. Most ToF lidar systems use laser light with a 905-nm wavelength invisible to humans and can sense objects over 100 m away while remaining eye-safe. Some scanning ToF lidar systems can provide 360-degree distance measurements, making them particularly useful in AMR applications where spatial awareness in all directions matters.

Figure 2 AMR is equipped with a ToF lidar module on top to supply illumination in the form of laser pulses. Source: Texas Instruments

Obtaining accurate 3D distance information from cameras requires complex and computationally expensive image processing algorithms that can introduce latency and potential inaccuracies. Camera-based systems also require good lighting conditions to operate properly.

Due to light dispersion, most camera-based systems deliver accurate distance measurements only for objects a few meters away and lose accuracy at greater distances unless design engineers use large, costly lenses.

Ultrasonic sensors offer a low-cost solution for proximity detection, but suffer from limited range, poor accuracy, and susceptibility to interference from noise and surface characteristics. Accuracy for distance measurement typically falls within a range of several centimeters, and environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and the object surface texture heavily influence results. Additionally, a wide field of view makes it difficult to pinpoint the exact location of an obstacle, increasing the risk of false positives.

FMCW lidar adds velocity measurement for safer human-robot collaboration

FMCW lidar is quickly emerging as a superior sensing solution for smart factories, particularly in collaborative robotic applications.

Unlike ToF, which measures distance based on the time it takes a laser pulse to return, FMCW lidar transmits a continuous wave laser that varies in frequency. By analyzing the frequency difference between the transmitted and received signals, the system applies the Doppler principle to directly measure both distance and velocity with extremely high precision.

This velocity measurement provides critical advantage in environments where robots work alongside humans and other robots, enabling a proactive response to movement and significantly reducing collision and injury risks. FMCW lidar also achieves longer distance measurement range at the same laser power as ToF-based systems. Figure 3 shows a high-level diagram of an FMCW lidar system.

Figure 3 The high-level diagram shows how an FMCW lidar system works. Source: Texas Instruments

In high-throughput manufacturing environments utilizing conveyor belts, FMCW lidar offers significant advantages over traditional camera-based vision systems for object detection and tracking.

Camera-based systems rely on image processing and pattern recognition, which can be computationally intensive and sensitive to object orientation. Conversely, FMCW lidar directly measures distance and velocity regardless of these factors, enabling quicker and more reliable detection even with fast-moving objects.

FMCW lidar’s ability to create a dense 3D point cloud allows engineers to determine accurate size and shape without complex image analysis, significantly increasing overall manufacturing line throughput and system accuracy.

Driving what’s next in smart factory automation

The increasing demand for automation, efficiency, and safety in modern manufacturing is driving the rapid adoption of advanced sensing technologies such as ToF and FMCW lidar. Both technologies offer substantial advantages over camera-based vision systems and ultrasonic sensors in dynamic environments where human-robot collaboration takes priority.

ToF lidar provides accurate 3D spatial data for reliable obstacle detection and precise distance measurements. FMCW lidar further elevates performance through the direct measurement of both distance and velocity, crucial for proactive collision avoidance and enhanced safety.

Companies such as Texas Instruments provide essential semiconductor building blocks such as transimpedance amplifiers, laser drivers, analog-to-digital converters (ADCs), digital-to-analog converters (DACs), and a comprehensive range of power products that are vital for designing and building high-performance ToF and FMCW lidar systems.

Ongoing innovation in laser technology and signal processing promises continued advancements in lidar capabilities, positioning it as a cornerstone technology in the evolution of smart factories and industrial automation.

Anthony Vaughan is marketing manager for high-speed amplifiers at Texas Instruments.

 

 

Special Section: Smart Factory

• Rethinking machine vision in industrial automation
• Smart factory: The rise of PoE in industrial environments

The post Precision lasers boost safety and efficiency in smart factories appeared first on EDN.

Leveraging a prior fixture design with different lab equipment once again enables highly reliable results.

High resolution bench digital multimeters (DMMs) are commonplace now in most work labs, even trickling down to home labs and one-person shops! These DMMs are great for all sorts of measurements, including those of low Z components when utilizing the popular 4-wire Kelvin-type probes and clips.

Wow the engineering world with your unique design: Design Ideas Submission Guide

However, attempting to measure low Z SMD components can be challenging even with the best probes and clips, thereby explaining why I developed a specialized custom fixture for bench-type LCR meters. This fixture has subsequently proven quite valuable when measuring various SMD inductors, capacitors and resistors. The thought of using a similar concept for high-resolution DMMs with four banana type inputs therefore naturally occurred to me. Specifically, since I’d already created custom PCBs with lever arm-toggling capabilities for holding SMDs in place, why not utilize the same PCB and lever arm concepts for DMM use?

DMMs require banana plugs as inputs; high-resolution DMM models have four total. As with the custom LCR meter fixture, my not wanting to have any potentially tangling cables would instead require a somewhat direct four-wire connection to the DMM utilizing banana plugs. Various bare banana plug options are available, such as the ones used in the Tektronix 577 adapter, along with commonplace ones found in audio applications. Since the audio types were handy, they’re what I used.

Mechanical support for the four banana plugs and the custom PCB was provided by a custom developed 3D-printed enclosure (Figures 1-3). The connections between the PCB and banana plugs were originally made by spade lugs (shown), but this approach proved difficult when tightening down the banana plugs. Instead, I later utilized direct-soldered wire connections.

Figure 1 Adapting a tried-and-true PCB design to a different kind of test and measurement equipment proved straightforward.

Figure 2 The design approach leverages commonplace audio banana plug.

Figure 3 The resultant fixture is compact and rugged.

Operation with low Z SMD components such as 2512 precision metal film resistors is possible with very good repeatability and stability, even on older DMMs such as the HP/AG34401A (Figures 4-6)!

Figure 4 The fixture delivers highly accurate, stable and repeatable measurement results.

Figure 5 This time, the fixture is being used in a full enclosed fashion.

Figure 6 The fixture works well even with legacy DMMs.

This custom fixture has been quite useful in my small home office/lab and didn’t cost me a week’s salary….actually, my week’s salary now won’t even buy me a coffee, since I’m now semi-retired, but you get the point! Hopefully, others will also find this fixture useful with their high-resolution bench DMMs.

Michael A Wyatt is a life member with the IEEE and has continued to enjoy electronics ever since his childhood. Mike has a long career spanning Honeywell, Northrop Grumman, Insyte/ITT/Ex-elis/Harris, ViaSat and retiring (semi) with Wyatt Labs. During his career he accumulated 32 US Patents and in the past published a few EDN articles including Best Idea of the Year in 1989.

Related Content

• Custom DIY LCR SMD fixture for low-Z components
• DIY custom Tektronix 576 & 577 curve tracer adapters
• DMM Plug-In Test Resistor with temperature sensing

 

The post Custom DIY DMM SMD fixture for low Z measurements appeared first on EDN.

Intelligent power and sensing technology firm onsemi of Scottsdale, AZ, USA and China-based Geely Auto Group Co Ltd have expanded their global strategic collaboration aimed at accelerating the development of next-generation electric and hybrid vehicles. The partnership deepens system-level integration of onsemi’s EliteSiC silicon carbide technologies across Geely’s vehicle platforms to drive faster, more efficient EV development...

Built this last year based on Ben Eater’s 8-bit computer design using 74LS series ICs on breadboards. Implemented core modules including registers, ALU, program counter, memory address register, and control logic. The LEDs are used to visualize bus states and output during execution. Biggest challenges were signal stability and debugging wiring issues across multiple modules. Getting consistent clock behavior also took some iteration. Overall, it was a great hands-on way to understand how a simple CPU operates at the hardware level. submitted by /u/mapfolds [link] [comments]

📋 Запрошуємо на KPI Career beAhead Expo. Spring 2026: твій крок до кар’єри kpi вт, 04/28/2026 - 10:52

"Група дезактивації води". Наша праця не була марною. Інформація КП вт, 04/28/2026 - 10:00

Opto-semiconductor device maker Seoul Viosys Co Ltd (SVC, a subsidiary of South Korean LED maker Seoul Semiconductor Co Ltd) is accelerating its entry into the next-generation photonics market supported by its proprietary ‘No-wire’ and ‘No-package’ fundamental patents — essential technologies for micron (μm)-scale miniaturization of opto-semiconductors — as well as its vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) technology...

China-based Innoscience (Suzhou) Technology Holding Co Ltd, which manufactures GaN-on-silicon power chips on 8” silicon wafers says that it has received two favorable judgments from the Beijing Intellectual Property Court in patent administrative litigation cases. The court fully upheld the validity of Innoscience’s two core invention patents related to gallium nitride (GaN) technology and rejected the invalidation requests of Infineon Technologies AG of Munich, Germany...

Aeluma Inc of Goleta, CA, USA has appointed Willy Rachmady Ph.D. as its VP of strategic partnerships and ecosystem, reporting directly to president & CEO Jonathan Klamkin Ph.D. He will lead foundry and ecosystem partnerships, customer engineering, and the firm’s technology commercialization strategy spanning silicon photonics and compound semiconductor platforms...

Indium Corp of Clinton, NY, USA (a supplier of refined gallium, germanium, indium and other specialty technology metals) has been awarded a $3.2m grant by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation (CMEI) to develop a domestic process for recovering high-purity gallium from manufacturing by-products — a critical step toward establishing a secure, domestic supply chain for a material essential to modern defense systems, semiconductors, and advanced electronics...

Intelligent power and sensing technology firm onsemi of Scottsdale, AZ, USA has announced an expanded strategic collaboration with China-based car maker NIO Inc to advance next-generation electric vehicle (EV) platforms. Building on a multi-year partnership, the firms are more closely engaging to accelerate NIO’s transition from 400V to 900V architectures, enabled by onsemi’s latest EliteSiC enhanced M3e technology...

Mineral exploration company Volta Metals Ltd of Toronto, Canada (which owns, has optioned and is currently exploring a critical minerals portfolio of rare-earths, gallium, lithium, cesium and tantalum projects in Ontario) has received approval for funding of up to $215,000 under the Ontario Junior Exploration Program (OJEP). The funding will support eligible exploration expenditures incurred in 2025 and the first two months of 2026 at its 4750-hectare Springer Rare Earth Element (REE) and Gallium Project, located about 70km east of Sudbury, Ontario, with direct access via the Trans-Canada Highway and Highway 64...

I found a piece of a laptop with a fingerprint scanner from 2007 in a junk bin. Surprisingly, it works perfectly with Windows 11 and reads my fingerprint without any problems. It requires a 3.3-volt voltage regulator to power it. I 3D-printed the enclosure and came up with a pretty good device. submitted by /u/SpaceRuthie [link] [comments]

Increasing power demands in data centers demand high-efficiency, high-density power-conversion solutions.

Figure 1 shows a block diagram of power distribution inside an IT tray. A 48V bus bar goes down the back of the rack to distribute power to the IT trays. Inside each tray is hot-swap or e-fuse circuitry to limit inrush current during tray plug-in and to protect the upstream rack during tray failures. Intermediate bus converters (IBCs) convert 48V to the second-stage voltage, usually 12V or 6V. Final-stage multiphase buck voltage regulators complete power delivery by converting the second-stage voltage to the loads, with the majority of power going to sub-1V, high-current processors. In this edition of Power Tips, I will focus on the 48V IBC, covering design considerations, comparing topologies, and discussing system trade-offs of various approaches.

Figure 1 48V IT tray power distribution. Source: Texas Instruments

The IBC power distribution network offers a wide range of power-conversion approaches inside an IT tray (Reference 1). As the system architect, you have three main design choices:

• A modular or discrete solution (also known as chip-down design).
• Regulated, unregulated (also known as fixed ratio) or semiregulated IBC operation.
• The second-stage bus voltage to maximize system performance.

When selecting a modular or chip-down design power converter, your main trade-off will be power density vs. board design flexibility. Power modules, as shown in Figure 2a, are highly optimized solutions built on high-layer-count printed circuit boards (PCBs) (usually more than 16), offering prequalification and the highest power density. The drawbacks of power modules are a lack of flexibility, with fixed footprints and set features, as well as a higher cost per watt.

Chip-down designs, as shown in Figure 2b, are highly flexible solutions that offer footprint and feature freedom, with a lower cost per watt in high-volume production. Their drawbacks include longer upfront time and greater cost investments to qualify the design.

(a) (b)

Figure 2 48V IBC design examples of modular (a) and chip-down design (b) approaches. Source: Texas Instruments

When considering the output regulation of the IBC, your choice depends on two main factors: the load being powered and the operating range of the IBC’s input bus voltage. When the IBC directly drives 12V loads such as cooling fans, hard drives and Peripheral Component Interconnect Express cards, only a fully regulated output voltage (Reference 1) will ensure component safety. In modern data centers, the tray voltage has a more stable, narrow range, typically 40V to 60V. This narrow input range gives you the option to use higher-efficiency and higher-power-density fixed-ratio or semiregulated IBCs. The regulated second-stage voltage regulators following the IBC stage can absorb fixed-ratio IBC output voltage fluctuations.

Your third design choice is the second-stage voltage delivered by the IBC. Equation 1 determines system efficiency (ηsystem):

ηsystem = ηIBC x ηPDN x ηVR

For a given power load, decreasing the second-stage bus voltage will lower the IBC efficiency (ηIBC), because it must deliver more current at a lower voltage to provide the same output power. Similarly, for the motherboard power distribution network (PDN), which distributes current from the first-stage IBC to the second-stage voltage regulator, the PDN efficiency (ηPDN) will also decrease because of increased I2 x R ohmic losses. The benefit of a lower second-stage bus voltage is apparent when using final-stage, high-frequency, high-current voltage regulators with significantly reduced voltage-related switching losses. This results in higher second-stage efficiency (ηVR) and a potentially smaller size of the second stage.

Unlike a buck converter-dominated second-stage voltage regulator, a first-stage IBC has a wide range of power delivery approaches and thus a wider variety of power-conversion topologies available. In most modern IT applications, isolation for safety purposes is not required, so your power topology options increase further when you can consider transformerless options. Figure 3 shows four popular options for IBC module and chip-down designs.

The full-bridge converter shown in Figure 3a is a simple buck converter-derived transformer-isolated topology. The full-bridge converter’s strengths are ease of regulation and the ability to easily scale the intended output voltage by adjusting the transformer turns ratio for your chosen second-stage bus voltage. One drawback of the full-bridge converter is that transformer design is key to its performance, requiring a high-layer-count PCB that limits the topology to module-based designs. Another drawback of the full-bridge converter is that the primary devices are hard-switched, limiting power density and efficiency.

The transformer-isolated inductor-inductor-capacitor (LLC) converter shown in Figure 3b looks very similar to the full-bridge converter but uses an additional capacitor and two inductors to eliminate switching-related losses in the primary devices, enabling high efficiency and high power density (Reference 2). The LLC converter has the same transformer-related strength (an easily scalable output voltage) and weakness (it’s limited to module-based designs) as the full-bridge converter. The LLC converter operates with the highest efficiency at the resonant frequency set by the additional passive components (CR and LR), with efficiency decreasing as you move away from the resonant frequency to regulate the output voltage. For this reason, the LLC converter’s most common application in IBCs is fixed-ratio designs, always operating at the resonant frequency, ensuring the highest efficiency.

Two other popular topologies, the hybrid switched-capacitor (HSC) converter (Reference 3) shown in Figure 3c and the basic buck converter shown in Figure 3d, both offer benefits for chip-down designs because of their lack of AC-dependent power transformers. The HSC converter has a natural step-down ratio of 4-to-1, making it a strong candidate for high-efficiency 48V to 12V IBCs. The addition of flying capacitors limits the power density and hinders this converter’s operation in boost mode, making it a good fit for semiregulation, as regulating only occurs in step-down buck converter mode.

Because the HSC converter has a natural step-down ratio of 4-to-1, scaling the output voltage down further to an 8-to-1 6VOUT design (for example) is more challenging than it would be for the full-bridge and LLC converter options because the HSC converter must rely instead on a longer freewheeling period, requiring a larger output filter inductor, decreasing power density and efficiency.

The buck converter is the most common topology in power electronics, used exclusively in the second-stage voltage regulator, so it is natural to want to apply this simple and well-known approach to the IBC stage as well. The challenge with using a buck converter in the higher-voltage IBC application is that the power devices experience the highest voltage and current stresses when compared to the other topologies, limiting efficiency and power density.

(a) (b) (c) (d)

Figure 3 Popular IBC topologies: full-bridge converter (a); LLC converter (b); HSC converter (c); and buck converter (d). Source: Texas Instruments

Table 1 compares the different topologies and trade-offs.

  Full-bridge converter LLC converter HSC converter Buck converter

Module or chip-down design	Module	Module	Both	Both
Regulation type	Regulated	Fixed ratio	Semiregulated	Regulated
Efficiency	Medium	High	High	Low
Power density	Medium	High	Medium	Low
Output-voltage scalability	High	High	Medium	Medium
Complexity	Medium	High	High	Low

Table 1 Comparing IBC topology characteristics.

 With the maturation of gallium nitride (GaN) power devices (Reference 4), which have much lower switching-related charges compared to traditional silicon metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs), simpler topologies like the buck converter topology become more attractive and viable options for higher-voltage applications like IBCs. See Table 2.

  100V Texas Instruments GaN semiconductor 100V silicon MOSFET Difference

VDS (V)	100	100
RDS(on) (mΩ)	1.1	1.7	35% lower
QG (nC)	27	106	75% lower
QOSS (nC)	98	205	52% lower
QGD (nC)	2.5	26	90% lower
FOM1 = QG x RDS(on)	29.7	180.2	83% lower
FOM2 = QOSS x RDS(on)	107.8	348.5	69% lower
FOM3 = QGD x RDS(on)	2.75	44.2	93% lower
Package (mm x mm = mm2)	4 x 6.5 = 26 FET with gate driver	5 x 6 = 30 Discrete FET	13% smaller

Table 2 Comparison of 100V GaN and silicon-based IBC semiconductor options.

The IBC power distribution network offers the widest range of power-conversion approaches of the systems inside an IT tray for good reason. As power requirements and architectures rapidly evolve, the best way to optimize performance for 48V IBCs changes. And as additional variables such as highly improved GaN semiconductors get thrown into the equation, it becomes even more important to understand design considerations, topology comparisons and trade-offs.

References

1. Hsu, C., L. Olariu, S. Zou, et al. “48V Onboard Power Solution Requirements.” Open Compute Project, Version 1.0.0, Nov. 15, 2024.
2. McDonald, Brent. “Overview of a planar transformer used in a 1kW high-density LLC power module.” Texas Instruments technical article, 2025.
3. Li, C., and J.A. Cobos. “A Switched Capacitor and Autotransformer Hybrid Converter With DC Current in the Windings,” in IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 37 (2), February 2022, pp. 1870-1884.
4. Gallium nitride (GaN) power stages, Texas Instruments.

David Reusch is a systems engineer on the data center team at Texas Instruments, specializing in power electronics. David has more than 20 years of experience in power electronics, ranging from cutting-edge gallium nitride (GaN) technology to high-reliability space-grade DC-DC converters. He received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Virginia Tech.

 

Related Content

• Power Tips #151: Improving efficiency in 48V-input multiphase buck converters with GaN
• Power Tips # 141: Tips and tricks for achieving wide operating ranges with LLC resonant converters
• Power Tips #134: Don’t switch the hard way; achieve ZVS with a PWM full bridge
• Power Tips #127: Using advanced control methods to increase the power density of GaN-based PFC

The post Power Tips #152: Design considerations and topology comparisons for 48V intermediate bus converters appeared first on EDN.

Thing of beauty! Wanted to clean it before testing it but its so pristine inside :O submitted by /u/XDFreakLP [link] [comments]