Українською
  In English
Feed aggregator
Two new runtime tools to accelerate edge AI deployment

While traditional artificial intelligence (AI) frameworks often struggle in ultra-low-power scenarios, two new edge AI runtime solutions aim to accelerate the deployment of sophisticated AI models in battery-powered devices like wearables, hearables, Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, and industrial monitors.
Ambiq Micro, the company that develops low-power microcontrollers using sub-threshold transistors, has unveiled two new edge AI runtime solutions optimized for its Apollo system-on-chips (SoCs). These developer-centric tools—HeliosRT (runtime) and HeliosAOT (ahead-of-time)—offer deployment options for edge AI across a wide range of applications, spanning from digital health and smart homes to industrial automation.
Figure 1 The new runtime tools allow developers to deploy sophisticated AI models in battery-powered devices. Source: Ambiq
The industry has seen numerous failures in the edge AI space because users dislike it when the battery runs out in an hour. It’s imperative that devices running AI can operate for days, even weeks or months, on battery power.
But what’s edge AI, and what’s causing failures in the edge AI space? Edge AI is anything that’s not running on a server or in the cloud; for instance, AI running on a smartwatch or home monitor. The problem is that AI is power-intensive, and sending data to the cloud over a wireless link is also power-intensive. Moreover, the cloud computing is expensive.
“What we aim is to take the low-power compute and turn it into sophisticated AI,” said Carlos Morales, VP of AI at Ambiq. “Every model that we create must go through runtime, which is firmware that runs on a device to take the model and execute it.”
LiteRT and HeliosAOT tools
LiteRT, formerly known as TensorFlow Lite for microcontrollers, is a firmware version for TensorFlow platform. HeliosRT, a performance-enhanced implementation of LiteRT, is tailored for energy-constrained environments and is compatible with existing TensorFlow workflows.
HeliosRT optimizes custom AI kernels for the Apollo510 chip’s vector acceleration hardware. It also improves numeric support for audio and speech processing models. Finally, it delivers up to 3x gains in inference speed and power efficiency over standard LiteRT implementations.
Next, HeliosAOT introduces a ground-up, ahead-of-time compiler that transforms TensorFlow Lite models directly into embedded C code for edge AI deployment. “AOT interpretation, which developers can perform on their PC or laptop, produces C code, and developers can take that code and link it to the rest of the firmware,” Morales said. “So, developers can save a lot of memory on the code size.”
HeliosAOT provides a 15–50% reduction in memory footprint compared to traditional runtime-based deployments. Furthermore, with granular memory control, it enables per-layer weight distribution across the Apollo chip’s memory hierarchy. It also streamlines deployment with direct integration of generated C code into embedded applications.
Figure 2 HeliosRT and HeliosAOT tools are optimized for Apollo SoCs. Ambiq
“HeliosRT and HeliosAOT are designed to integrate seamlessly with existing AI development pipelines while delivering the performance and efficiency gains that edge applications demand,” said Morales. He added that both solutions are built on Ambiq’s sub-threshold power optimized technology (SPOT).
HeliosRT is now available in beta via the neuralSPOT SDK, while a general release is expected in the third quarter of 2025. On the other hand, HeliosAOT is currently available as a technical preview for select partners, and general release is planned for the fourth quarter of 2025.
Related Content
- AI at the edge: It’s just getting started
- Implementing AI at the edge: How it works
- AI Is on the Edge, but Is Safety in the System?
- Edge AI: Bringing Intelligence Closer to the Source
- Edge AI: The Future of Artificial Intelligence in embedded systems
The post Two new runtime tools to accelerate edge AI deployment appeared first on EDN.
I got my pcbs
![]() | For full adder [link] [comments] |
This glue will be the death of me
![]() | I work in electronics repair and this glue is used in an extremely large amount of units. Unfortunately there are certain types of this glue that go conductive after a while (3-10 years) and it creates an absolute nightmare. [link] [comments] |
India’s Global Rise in Electronics Backed by $40B Exports, Says Vaishnaw
Addressing the 14th convocation of IIT Hyderabad, Union Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw declared a landmark achievement. India’s electronics exports have surpassed USD 40 billion an incredible eight-fold increase in just 11 years. The production of electronics within India grew six-fold during the same timeframe, a factor that lends credence to the manufacturing capability of the nation.
Important Highlights from Vaishnaw’s Address:
Exports & Production Growth: Electronics production has grown 6× and the exports 8× during the last 11 years, sustaining double-digit CAGR.
Semiconductor Ambitions: The commercial production of the first Made-in-India semiconductor chip is expected to be seeded by the end of this year. India aspires to become one of the top five semiconductor countries in the near future.
Telecom Stack Success: A fully indigenous 4G telecom stack was created in just 3½ years and is now powering ~90,000 towers, more than the networks in many countries.
5G Labs & Talent Building: The government has rolled out 100 5G labs, having distributed EDA tools from Cadence, Synopsys & Siemens to over 270 colleges and institutions (including startups, the number increases to 340) for the fostering of semiconductor design talent.
Infrastructure Boost: Vaishnaw also discussed the quick development of Mumbai-Ahmedabad, India’s first bullet train, which is expected to start operations in August or September 2027.
These achievements highlight the Modi government’s efforts to create a self-sufficient electronics ecosystem that includes chip design, telecommunications, and semiconductor manufacturing under the Make-in-India project.
The electronics export stood at an estimated USD 12.41 billion in Q1 FY26 (April-June), with year-to-year growth clocking an impressive 47%. The chief markets for Indian electronics export were the United States (60.2%), the UAE (8.1%), and China (3.9%), marking India’s ascension on the global map of electronics manufacturing.
The growth in Q1 confirms India’s status as a developing center for electronics production and makes a significant contribution to the USD 40 billion annual export milestone.
The Significance of This Leap:
- Global Market Integration: Dominance of markets like US, UAE, and China signals deeper integration of India into global supply chains.
- Security and Self-Reliance: Indigenous telecom stack and semiconductor push furthers the national security and reduces import dependency.
- Job Creation and Skill Building: Economic boom arising from semiconductors, EDA labs, and 5G infrastructure projects is creating demand for skilled professionals.
- Strategic Infrastructure Synergy: By collaborating with major projects like telecom, railroads, and bullet trains, the growth of electronics supports national modernization
Conclusion:
Rising electronics exports in India with the scaling-up of manufacturing processes crystals the evolution of a manufacturing ecosystem aligned with the Make-in-India initiative. The assurance of indigenous semiconductors, solid telecom backdrop, and a talent pipeline pave India’s way as an electronics and technological hub across the world.
The post India’s Global Rise in Electronics Backed by $40B Exports, Says Vaishnaw appeared first on ELE Times.
Nexperia and TU Hamburg launch endowed chair in power electronics
Renesas adds 650V GaN FETs for high-density power conversion
КПІ ім. Ігоря Сікорського співпрацюватиме з АТ «Укртелеком»
У КПІ ім. Ігоря Сікорського — новий стратегічний партнер: університет співпрацюватиме з АТ «Укртелеком» задля розвитку сфери інформаційно-телекомунікаційних технологій та створення для студентів, викладачів та науковців ще більше освітніх, наукових і карʼєрних можливостей.
Tata Electronics and Bosch Sign Pact to Advance India’s Chip and Auto-Tech Ecosystem
The signing of the MoU by Tata Electronics and Robert Bosch GmbH stands as a landmark in the electronics and semiconductor manufacturing industries, significantly marking a major achievement in India’s journey toward attaining self-reliance.
A Strategic Duo:
Under this MoU, the parties will cooperate on semiconductor chip packaging and manufacturing, which concern the latter part of the semiconductor supply chain after wafer fabrication. The projects shall be undertaken at Tata Electronics’ assembly-and-test plant in Assam near completion and at its semiconductor foundry in Gujarat.
Assam: Tata Electronics is setting up the ₹27,000 crore, 600-acre semiconductor assembly and test facility in Jagiroad. Commercial operation of the plant will commence in mid-2025 and will entail advanced packaging technologies with a production capacity of 41 million chips per day.
Gujarat: Tata is executing the construction of its first fab in the Dholera Special Investment Region worth ₹91,000 crore, with support from Taiwan’s Powerchip, which will be used for large-scale production of 50,000 wafers per month starting around 2026.
This initiative jointly puts the strengths of each partner category to use: aggressive investments made by Tata across design, assembly, and test, fabrication, and packaging,” and Bosch’s deep expertise in packaging technologies and its position as a long‑time global supplier of automotive electronics.
Strengthening India’s Auto & Electronics Ecosystem
Beyond chip processing, the collaboration is intended to be widened into EMS space for the automotive industry, an area rapidly soaring as vehicles themselves become electrified and digitized.
For Tata, this alliance clearly steps into its layered approach: prior MoUs with Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) on chip design, with Powerchip Semiconductor and with Himax Technologies on display-chip manufacture signaling an ambition to head in fab-to-front-end packaging.
India Semiconductor Leap: What This Alliance Brings
- An integrated chip supply chain: The MoU is a signal for moving towards a vertically integrated semiconductor network-from chip fab to packaging and system implementation-anchored within India.
- Job creation & Regional growth: Thousands of direct and indirect job opportunities will be created, more so for the backward regions like Assam where indu will be fast.
- Global cooperation: The agreement reflects global confidence in India’s manufacturing potential—joining forces with an engineering giant like Bosch intensifies that signal.
- Auto‑tech transformation: As vehicle electronics grow more sophisticated—covering sensors, advanced driver assistance, power management, and connectivity—this alliance prepares India to be a hub for innovation in mobility.
Path Ahead & Prospects:
Looking ahead, Tata Electronics plans to ramp up its Gujarat line for large‑scale wafer production by 2026 and expand its packaging & test unit in Assam. Bosch may also deploy its global packaging tech like 3D packaging helping India cross into advanced nodes and complex system‑in‑package offerings.
This collaboration stands as a cornerstone for India’s semiconductor journey where strategic investments, policy support, and global partnerships could coalesce into a self‑sustaining, world‑class semiconductor economy.
The post Tata Electronics and Bosch Sign Pact to Advance India’s Chip and Auto-Tech Ecosystem appeared first on ELE Times.
Fixed an LCD with a torn flat flex
![]() | The flex ribbon that was bonded to this LCD ripped. Good thing there's test points on the board [link] [comments] |
If it can go wrong, it will go wrong - hackathon badge got inserted into PCIE connector.
![]() | It was not meant to be inserted there friend... [link] [comments] |
Why 90% of Component Compliance Issues Are Preventable (And How To Stop Them)
One channel strip of a Harrison series ten B mixer
![]() | Fully analog sound signal path, but digital control that allows automation. Only about 20 were ever made and the full device weighs 1400 pounds xD [link] [comments] |
Exploring Bessel Functions: Understanding the Spectrum of Tone-Modulated FM
Look what i found while buying bms boards for lion batteries
![]() | Lol there is an extra resistor which is out of place. bad soldering lol [link] [comments] |
Well.. this is a first :D
![]() | I guess the resistor wanted to cuddle up a bit xd There shouldn’t be too much heat. The buck converter is powering a small fan, so not much current. Also the fan is right behind the trimmer pushing air in. But the trimmer somewhat shields the diode from getting airflow.. [link] [comments] |
Weekly discussion, complaint, and rant thread
Open to anything, including discussions, complaints, and rants.
Sub rules do not apply, so don't bother reporting incivility, off-topic, or spam.
Reddit-wide rules do apply.
To see the newest posts, sort the comments by "new" (instead of "best" or "top").
[link] [comments]
Some I2C pull ups for your Friday.
![]() | I love a well designed board, but there’s also something so fun about Frankensteining a dev board to meet your needs. [link] [comments] |
EEVblog 1697 - What's Up With Different Brand Op-Amps?
Did connectivity sunsetting kill your embedded-system battery?

You’re likely familiar with the concept of “sunsetting,” where a connectivity standard or application is scheduled to be phased out, such that users who depend on it are often simply “out of luck.” It’s frustrating, as it can render an established working system that is doing its job properly either partially or totally useless. The industry generally rationalizes sunsetting as an inevitable consequence of the progress and new standards not only superseding old ones but making them obsolete.
Sunsetting can leave unintended or unknowing victims, but it goes far beyond just loss of connectivity, and I am speaking from recent experience. My 2019 ICE Subaru Outback wouldn’t start despite its fairly new battery; it was totally dead as if the battery was missing. I jumped the battery and recharged it by running the car for about 30 minutes, but it was dead again the next morning. I assumed it was either a defective charging system or a low- or medium-resistance short circuit somewhere.
(As an added punch to the gut, with the battery dead, there was no way to electronically unlock the doors or get to the internal hood release, so it seemed it would have to be towed. Fortunately, the electronic key fob has a tiny “secret” metal key that can be used in its old-fashioned, back-up mechanical door lock just for such situations.)
I jump-started it again and drove directly to the dealer, who verified the battery and charging system were good. Then the service technician pulled a technical rabbit out of his hat—apparently, this problem was no surprise to the service team.
The vampire (drain) did it—but not the usual wayThe reason for the battery being drained is subtle but totally avoidable. It was an aggravated case of parasitic battery drain (often called “vampire drain” or “standby power”; I prefer the former) where the many small functions in the car still drain a few milliamps each as their keep-alive current. The aggregate vampire power drawn by the many functions in the car, even when the car is purportedly “off,” can kill the battery.
Subaru used 3G connectivity to link the car to their basic Starlink Safety and Security emergency system, a free feature even if you don’t pay for its many add-on subscription functions (I don’t). However, 3G cellular service is being phased out or “sunsetted” in industry parlance. Despite this sunsetting, the car’s 3G transponder, formally called a Telematics Data Communication Module (TDCM or DCM), just kept trying, thus killing the battery.
The dealer was apologetic and replaced the 3G unit at no cost with a 4G-compatible unit that they conveniently had in stock. I suspect they were prepared for this occurrence all along and were hoping to keep it quiet. There have been some class-action suits and settlements on this issue, but the filing deadline had passed, so I was out of luck on that.
An open-market replacement DCM unit is available for around $500. While the dealer pays less, it’s still not cheap, and swapping them is complicated and time-consuming. It takes at least an hour for physical access, setup, software initialization, and check-out—if you know what you are doing. There are many caveats in the 12-page instruction DCM section for removal and replacement of the module (Figure 1) as well as in the companion 14-page guide for the alternative Data Communication Module (DCM) Bypass Box (Figure 2), which details some tricky wire-harness “fixing.”
Figure 1 The offending unit is behind the console (dashboard) and takes some time to remove and then replace. Source: Subaru via NHTSA
Figure 2 There are also some cable and connector issues of which the service technician must be aware and use care. Source: Subaru via NHTSA
While automakers impose strict limits on the associated standby drain current for each function, it still adds up and can kill the battery of a car parked and unused for anywhere from a few days to a month. The period depends on the magnitude of the drain and the battery’s condition. I strongly suspect that the 3G link transponder uses far more power than any of the other functions, so it’s a more worrisome vampire.
Sunsetting + vampire drain = troubleWhat’s the problem here? Although 3G was being sunsetted, that was not the real problem; discontinuing a standard is inevitable at some point. Further, there could also be many other reasons for not being able to connect, even if 3G was still available, such as being parked in a concrete garage. After all, both short- and long-term link problems should be expected.
No, the problem is a short-sighted design that allowed a secondary, non-core function over which you have little or no control (here, the viability of the link) to become a priority and single-handedly drain power and deplete the battery. Keep in mind that the car is perfectly safe to use without this connectivity feature being available.
There’s no message to the car’s owner that something is wrong; it just keeps chugging away, attempting to fulfill its mission, regardless of the fact that it depletes the car’s battery. It has a mission objective and nothing will stop it from trying to complete it, somewhat like the relentless title character in the classic 1984 film The Terminator.
A properly vetted design would include a path that says if connectivity is lost for any reason, keep trying for a while and then go to a much lower checking rate, and perhaps eventually stop.
This embedded design problem is not just an issue for cars. What if the 3G or other link was part of a hard-to-reach, long-term data-collection system that was periodically reporting, but also had internal memory to store the data? Or perhaps it was part of a closed-loop measurement and control that could function autonomously, regardless of reporting functionality?
Continuously trying to connect despite the cost in power is a case of the connectivity tail not only wagging the core-function dog but also beating it to death. It is not a case of an application going bad due to forced “upgrades” leading to incompatibilities (you probably have your own list of such stories). Instead, it’s a design oversight of allowing a secondary, non-core function to take over the power budget (in some cases, also the CPU), thus disabling all the functionality.
Have you ever been involved with a design where a non-critical function was inadvertently allowed to demand and get excessive system resources? Have you ever been involved with a debug challenge or product-design review where this unpleasant fact had initially been overlooked, but was caught in time?
Whatever happens, I will keep checking to see how long 4G is available in my area. The various industry “experts” say 10 to 15 years, but these experts are often wrong! Will 4G connectivity sunset before my car does? Abd if it does, will the car’s module keep trying to connect and, once again, kill the battery? That remains to be seen!
Bill Schweber is an EE who has written three textbooks, hundreds of technical articles, opinion columns, and product features.
Related Content
- Powering the autonomous car
- The beneficial ripple effect of new automotive power devices
- Vampire Drain: The Bane of Today’s Cars
- Being Honest About Your Power Source
- Battery Self-Discharge is Real — But One Case Has Me Mystified
References
- Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP, Subaru 3G Battery Drain Lawsuit
- JND Legal Administration. Subaru Battery Settlement
- Legacy GT, Subaru Battery Drain due to shutdown of 3G net
- Subaru/NHTSA, Telematics DCM Replacement
- Subaru/NHTSA, Data Communication Module (DCM) Bypass Box
- Subaru Outback.org, That annoying battery drain problem on the Outback and other models
- Subaru Outback.org, Dead Battery: Telematics Data Communications Module (DCM) Warranty Extension 8yr/100k miles
- EV Guide, What Is Vampire Drain?
The post Did connectivity sunsetting kill your embedded-system battery? appeared first on EDN.
Evaluation board powers small robotics and drones

The EPC91118 reference design from EPC integrates power, sensing, and control on a compact circular PCB for humanoid robot joints and UAVs. Driven by the EPC23104 GaN-based power stage, the three-phase BLDC inverter delivers up to 10 A RMS steady-state output and 15 A RMS pulsed.
Complementing the GaN power stage are all the key functions for a complete motor drive inverter, including a microcontroller, rotor shaft magnetic encoder, regulated auxiliary rails, voltage and current sensing, and protection features. Housekeeping supplies are derived from the inverter’s main input, with a 5-V rail powering the GaN stage and a 3.3-V rail supplying the controller, sensors, and RS-485 interface. All these functions fit on a 32-mm diameter board, expanding to 55 mm including an external frame for mechanical integration.
The inverter’s small size allows integration directly into humanoid joint motors. GaN’s high switching frequency allows the use of compact MLCCs in place of bulkier electrolytic capacitors, helping reduce overall size while enhancing reliability. With a footprint reportedly 66% smaller than comparable silicon MOSFET designs, the EPC91118 enables a space-saving motor drive architecture.
EPC91118 reference design boards are priced at $394.02 each. The EPC23104 eGaN power stage IC costs $2.69 each in 3000-unit reels. Both are available for immediate delivery from Digi-Key.
The post Evaluation board powers small robotics and drones appeared first on EDN.
Pages
